A Chronological Abstract of the History of England

Needs Review

Select a page below to start transcribing. Both pages that need review and that are not started are available to edit. For help transcribing, view the transcription guides. For more information about this document, view the metadata.

  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review
  • Needs Review

Title

A Chronological Abstract of the History of England

Date Created

[1746-1805]

Description

It would appear that these documents were originally divided into several volumes as follows: 55 BC - [?853] (2059 - 2081); 852 - 1066 (2082 - 2094b); William I (2095 - 2098); Henry II (2099 - 2107); Richard I - Henry III (2108 - 2119); "Abstract of the History of England By ?M G L S" from 1366 - 1407 (2120 - 2145); Henry IV - Henry VI (2145 - 2173); "Minutes of the History of England" (2174) from 1485 - 1741 (2175 - 2186). With samples of practice handwriting (2174, 2187, 2188)
This essay would appear to have been written by a child or young person. With some annotations in a different hand or at a later date

Language

English

Identifier

RI36435